The Tragedy Of Medea By Sophocles - 1611 Words

Aristotle’s poetics goes into vast detail regarding what characteristics are necessary for a top-notch tragedy. While these norms may seem to be easily understood through the reading of Aristotle’s fine-tuned poetics, there is a different understanding that needs to be interpreted to truly grasp the significance and qualifications that makeup a good tragedy. Of the many tragedies that Euripides provides us with, I chose the tragedy of Medea to further analyze, and present a strong argument for why I think Aristotle would find Medea a top-notch tragedy. According to Aristotle, a top-notch tragedy consists of six main elements, a strong plot, storyline, style, morals, ideas, staging and music, with the most important of these six being that of the plot. I strongly feel that in terms of what entails a quality tragedy, Euripides Medea meets a large majority of these things. Medea offers us a tragedy that is filled with a concrete plot, a strong source of tragic effect as well as a well-put together sequence of events to which lead up to the unfolding of such events. One of the most critical aspects to a top-notch tragedy is the role and characteristics that an â€Å"ideal† tragic hero should posses. In this particular tragedy, this is the role to which Medea plays. A tragic hero is a character who makes a judgment error that inevitably leads to his or her own self-destruction. According to Aristotle’s an ideal tragic hero is â€Å"a man not outstanding in virtue or justice,Show MoreRelatedTragedy In Oedipus Rex And Antigone By Euripides784 Words   |  4 Pagespaper are the famously known Greek tragedies; Oedipus Rex and Antigone by Sophocles and Medea by Euripides that not only have the common genre of tragedy, but share the same motifs; homicide, suicide, and suffering. What is intriguing about these commonalities is that these playwrights, Sophocles and Euripides, use them. Homicide is an act when a human permanently harms another leading in death and these plays like to use it quite a bit. In Oedipus Rex, by Sophocles, the main character Oedipus (kingRead MoreEvaluation of Euripides Essay942 Words   |  4 Pagesconventions of Attic Tragedy up to a particular extent. Although he was often criticised for his work, he followed the structure and cycles of the traditional tragedy. However, his stance on the themes and ideas set him apart from the other writers. It is unreasonable to compare Euripides with the traditional writers of Attic tragedy without understanding his attitude and the reason for this attitude. Although he was only fifteen years older than Sophocles, he belonged toRead MoreSophocles Euripides Antigone1310 Words   |  6 PagesIn Sophocles’ Antigone, and in Euripides’ Medea, the Greek authors take on the topic of justice. Each playwright addresses the issue of injustices suffered by women and the concept of natural law. In both tragedies, the female leads seek justice after natural laws had been broken, but they ultimately break the natural law themselves, resulting in more injustice. During Medea s first long speech (lines 212 - 271), she declares that women are stricken with the most wretched existence on earth.Read MoreThe Tragic Women Of Tragedy985 Words   |  4 PagesThe Tragic Women of Tragedy Euripides and Sophocles wrote powerful tragedies that remain influential to this day. The vast majority of work recovered from this time is by male authorship. What remains about women of this time is written through the lens of male authors’ perspective and beliefs about the role of women in Greek culture. The works of these two playwrights frequently characterize women as unstable and dangerous. Agave, Antigone, and Medea are all undoubtedly the driving force behindRead MoreMedea And Oedipus Rex1447 Words   |  6 Pagesone sided answer. However, upon closer inspection, it is acceptable to say that although some would argue that people’s own desires dictate their actions, the influences of others play a more prominent role in how an individual acts. The Greek tragedies â€Å"Medea† and â€Å"Oedipus Rex† are both stories that explore this controversial topic. â€Å"Oedipus Rex† follows the story of a king named Oedipus. His land is plagued, and the only way to get rid of this plague is to exile the one who killed the previous rulerRead MoreAnalysis Of Euripides The Play Medea 1202 Words   |  5 PagesThree† of tragedians, Euripides was, in his time, less successful than both Aeschylus and Sophocles, who had 13 and 20 victories. Euripides’ writing was drastically different from that of the others. While playwrights like Sophocles wrote characters the way they should be ideally, Euripides wrote his characters truthfully and portrayed people as compassionate and cruel and complicated as humans really are. In Medea, Euripides details the story of the play’s namesake and leads readers to question hisRead More Comparing Female Characters in Euripides Medea and Sophocles Oedipus the King and Antigone1555 Words   |  7 PagesComparing Female Characters in Euripides Medea and Sophocles Oedipus the King and Antigone      Ã‚  Ã‚   In the times of the ancient Greeks, women had an unpretentious role. They were expected to do take on the accepted role of a woman.   In most cases, a womans role is restricted to bearing young, raising children, and housework. In Sophocles Oedipus   the King, Antigone, and Medea, the dominant female characters impacted upon men with authority and political power.   It is Read MoreThe Era of Greek Tragedy Essay2487 Words   |  10 PagesThe Era of Greek Tragedy In Athens, during the final thirty years of sixth century B.C. playwrights began creating the earliest drama in all of Europe, Greek tragedy (Sifakis, â€Å"Greek Tragedy†). Though now the products of the movement are seen as pieces of literature to be read, they originated as theatrical pieces meant to be performed on the stage. The tragedies were mostly derived from stories about their gods, such as Hades, Zeus and Nyx. In that time period, tales of these immortals wereRead MoreComparing Oedipus And Oedipus : Similarities And Differences1634 Words   |  7 PagesGaray Estefes Professor Dayna Castle 2332 21 September 2015 Medea and Oedipus: Similarities and Differences When comparing Oedipus and Medea we see the battle of good versus evil, as there is in any story that has a heroic or non heroic figure in the, but this time it is a little bit different from a normal good versus evil story since they are of course both tragedies. The question, in these stories, is whether or not Oedipus or Medea display any heroic qualities during the tragic battles, andRead MoreGreek vs. Roman Theatre Essay3174 Words   |  13 PagesHistoric playwrights such as Sophocles, Euripides, Aeschylus, and Seneca were described as prolific philosophers and geniuses of their times. These men actively participated in the politics surrounding them, and were respected and revered in their society. Each had their own individual style and portrayed their personalities through each of their noted works. Nevertheless, as with a majority of playwrights throughout history, most fodder for their plays have been adaptations of previous plays written

Pocket Money Should Be Given to the Teenagers or Not Free Essays

With the development of our modern society, peoples living conditions become much more comfortable. But along with intense competition, parents have less time to consider children needs in all-round. One method to solve this contradiction is to give children some pocket money. We will write a custom essay sample on Pocket Money Should Be Given to the Teenagers or Not or any similar topic only for you Order Now Pocket money is useful to children. But whether the children are considerable enough to make correct use of these money. There are two viewpoints about the pocket money. Some people think that giving children pocket money will make them become luxurious. Others think that will not lead to such disadvantage. In my opinion, both of them are partially reasonable. Nowadays teenagers are moving to independence and it will help them if they have some practice in managing money. Giving pocket money teaches teenagers to manage money while they are still young and parents can still guide them. Also, it help teenagers to make choices and to see that sometimes people have to wait and save up some money to get what they really want. The important predicament of pocket money must have certainly flashed your mind either during your childhood or as a parent now. Of course, the dilemma is always much more grave if you are a parent. Parents extensively differ in their perspectives of upbringing children in a system of granting pocket money to take care of their petty expenses. At first, the definite expenses that should be termed as petty is pretty much subjective in nature and needs to be well-defined to start with. The second question you need to ask is what is the extent to which a child be given freedom to spend money which is deemed as pocket money? While lot of parentaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s concerns revolves around promoting unhealthy competition amongst children on the amount of money they get and loss of control on a childaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s spending habits, there are also some positive lessons for teenagers such as inculcating money management skills and making tough decision regarding spending desires that offer less value to their lifestyle. Some peoples believe that giving children pocket money really has many advantages. With pocket money, children can buy their daily necessities such as pencils, little toys, and snack food they like. It will give children a certain freedom to select what they want, make them aware rules of the equivalent exchange. Since time to parents is very precious, giving pocket money to children help them to save time spent in shopping, but used in busy working and earning money. Children can get the value of the money when they are responsible to pay for their purchases and they will become more responsible with money matters. It can also lead the children pay for their things from their pocket money itself, so that they get to know how grownups set up a budget when salary comes and pay for living expenses. Some parents think that giving pocket money to their children can saves a lot of time for grownups to buy small things for them. Parents can utilize this time for other important tasks. Once start giving pocket money to children, they have to begin make important decision regarding spending money themselves, this will gives them the sense of purpose and achievement. Besides that, children feel a sense of independence and responsibility towards spending the money in the right way. They learn to understand the value of money. Children will get into the habit of planned income and expenditure. They also learn about saving budgeting. Giving pocket money to children makes them feel an important part of the family since they know that they get a part of the family’s monthly income. Therefore, the way of giving pocket money will develop a sense to children of how much has to be done to earn money, learn that ‘money doesn’t grow on trees’, learn what money can buy, how much they need to buy and what they need to buy. They can have their own money to spend and helping them develop self control and understanding the value of money, and learn to save money. Others insist that there are undoubtedly some disadvantages in spending pocket money. First, young children do not know how to use pocket money appropriately, they possibly consume all the money to buy expensive merchandise that they like, and then ask for extra money from their parents. Some parents cosset their children, and always give them a large amount of pocket money. Such conditions will make children become more and more prodigal. Second, since adults do not supervise the procedure of shopping, children could probably buy something that is not suitable for their age, such as adult magazines. The aâ‚ ¬? Current Pocket Money Trends in Malaysiaaâ‚ ¬? survey has cited that metropolitan children in the 12-20 ages group get as much as RM500 to over RM1500 a month of pocket money to spend on apparels, physical appearance, cell phone and other lifestyle products. A child may not be cautious in spending money, he or she can easily spend on frivolous unnecessary items. Children are not expected to know the value of money so they are never expected to make a wise decision regarding money. A child can easily get into trouble if there is no supervision with regards to money matters. He or she can be the prey to the bullies at school or play area if they are carrying lots of pocket money. Children may always think they will get paid for everything they do to help, you have to find the money to pay them regularly, it is hard to know what the pocket money is supposed to pay for and there will always seems to be something more. Although children learn to understand that amount of money is limited and they need to always choose between their various desires to ensure correct use of their pocket money. Some parents believe that pocket money should not be given since that will make the child feel that ‘parents money is not his/her money’, it could lead to unhealthy competition amongst children on the amount of pocket money they get, and they will loss of control on where children spend the money. By judging these two viewpoints above that I mentioned, I think that parents should give their children a limited amount of pocket money and there must always exist some preconditions such as the amount of pocket money must be finite; parents should instruct their children how to use the money moderately and what is suitable to them; for a costly merchandise, parents themselves should take children to buy it. With these preconditions, pocket money will do no harm to their children. Parents need to explain to them where the money is to be used. For example when you first give the amount to your daughter, you need to explain that this money is to cover her school special lunch; candies or soft drinks requirements for a week. If the child is given money without any direction, you could run the risk of the child using the money is a way that does not agree with you. In such cases, parents need to be very careful in not micro- managing where the child spends the pocket money, else the child will get irritated and will not get the aâ‚ ¬? sense of independenceaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ that parents want to instill in the child. Once children start spending, sometimes away from their parents in going to school, sports classes, tuitions, and they need to carry some amount of money on them. In the beginning, the amount of money should be small and should be periodically reviewed as the child grows. For example parents could decide that every birthday, they will give an increment to your childaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s pocket money. If your child excels in academics or sports, they could get higher pocket money increments! How much is the best as the pocket money? Parents must always ensure that they give comparable pocket money to their children. It should neither be too much or too little compared to friends. Giving more pocket money than friends will make your child spend more and consider money as frivolous and easily available. If your child gets less pocket money than his/her friends, it will lead to an inferiority complex and the child might start resenting you. An idea might be to give your child a set amount each week, putting half in a savings account. At the end of a time agreed on by you both, perhaps three months and the child can spend the saved money exactly as they wish. If they choose to ‘waste’ it on lollies they can do so. However most children want something special and usually prefer to save for that particular thing and not waste it on a brief pleasure. This helps teach them the value of saving. Another way treat pocket money as a way of punishment. Parents must be careful not to use pocket money as a way of punishment to their children. Often, parents use aâ‚ ¬? suspension of pocket moneyaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ as an easy way of punishing their children. This format of punishment is not wrong to use but must be applied carefully. For example if the child has a broken a beautiful vase and you want him/ her to understand the value of the same, you can penalize the child by deducting/ taking away the monthaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s pocket money. But you cannot start using pocket money as a weapon to get the child to abide by all your wishes. For example you might want your child to have two glasses of milk everyday which he may not want to; in such cases by incentivizing the child for more pocket money will be wrong to do since such a format of giving money is not pocket money but aâ‚ ¬? bribeaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. Similarly, pocket money penalty cannot be used as a blanket punishment to all wrong-doings. If the child starts feeling that he/she will never really get pocket money due to some punishment, he/she might be tempted to steal money from parents. If you decide to give pocket money you need to work out, how much is reasonable, whether the money will be paid for doing chores, how much must be done to earn it, and how much is simply because aâ‚ ¬? you are a member of the familyaâ‚ ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢, how much each job is worth, whether all children get the same amount or the older child gets more, how much control parents will have over the use of pocket money or do they have to save some, what can they buy with it, when you will pay? Because the children won’t learn about the responsibility of money if parents don’t honor the agreement. How to cite Pocket Money Should Be Given to the Teenagers or Not, Essay examples

The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics

Question: Discuss about the maker of smartphone surveillance app fined, avoids jail time. Answer: Background Mr. Hammad Akbar owner of the company which developed Stealth Genie, an app developed and marketed as a way to catch cheating lovers and spouses, was fined by the US District Court of East Virginia. The app once installed on a phone could be used to secretly monitor all the activities of the owner of the phone including the calls made, photos, videos and other files on the phone and it could even switch on the microphone of the phone that enabled the listener to even listen to the normal and daily conversations and ambient sounds of the target. This app mostly used by abusive and paranoid spouses often led to instances of domestic violence and a breach to security and privacy of the people being snooped. However Mr. Hammad claims to be ignorant of the fact that the app developed by his company was illegal (Zapotosky, 2014). Application of Consequential Theory According to the consequential theory of ethics the morality of an action depends on the consequences of the result of that arises from it. Rather than the motive the end is the more important aspect in this theory. Thus as per this theory if the end result arising from any action if not god then that particular action is intrinsically bad (Vadastreanu, Maier, Maier, 2015). Privacy and security are the two basic rights for any person to live happily in this world. An app like stealth genie questions these basic rights of the individuals. The app might have been developed by Mr. Hammads organization to help parents keep a track on their children or for caregivers to keep a track on their elderly relatives or for spouses to monitor and help in each others daily activities. But this is a secret app as the name indicates and once installed on the phone, it functions without the knowledge of the target. When this app is being used for good and beneficial purposes it helps in preventing m any untoward incidents. But as the two sides of a coin, if this particular app is being misused by paranoid spouses or exes and business rivals the case is different. Based on the perceived effect of this app the experience of the target differs. Such an app in many countries can be used only by law enforcing agencies or only in some other limited cases. The owner of the firm that developed the app claims to be ignorant of the legal formalities associated with the app. But while developing such an app that could help others gain control into the private lives of any individuals, the developers should always be extremely conscious about the harms it can bring into the lives of these targets. The consequences of the action should always be kept in mind while devising such a system. The marketing strategy undertaken by the firm also raises serious ethical concerns (Van Staveren, 2007). It was promoted as an app to catch red-handed the cheating lovers and so the intention of the develop ers behind the creation of such an app raises questions. If the motive behind the development of the app was for helping parents, caregivers or spouses in undertaking their intended duties it was a very fine and wonderful piece of work. Thus analyzing on lines with consequential theory, this app was an unethical creation because the consequence that resulted from developing this app was breach of the basic rights of security and privacy of other individuals Application of Deontological Theory In deontological theory of ethics the morality of an action is based on the adherence to the rules and laws associated with it. As per this theory every individual has rights and it is wrong to violate these rights (Smith, Netchaeva, Soderberg, Okhuysen, 2015). Keeping this in view when we analyze the current situation, even though he claims to be ignorant of legality behind the developed app, as per the existent rules and laws the action was illegal. It breaches the right to privacy and security of the individuals who are been spied upon. If this app was used by a business rival, it could have resulted in loss of intellectual property. There are many regulations and laws related to internet and the app developers should in any case be aware of these. Being ignorant of the related legislations and regulations it can be taken as an offence as it is an obligation of the developer to know the related laws and regulations. The instances of domestic violence and loss of business that mig ht have occurred because of such an app being available in the wrong hands should be taken into consideration. Each and every person has the right to be secure and have a private and personal space (Himma Tavani, 2008). This particular app breaches this very basic privilege and at the same time it is against laws and rules of the nation where the issue has been taken up. Thus while making use of deontological theory of ethics which is rule based or duty based, the actions of Mr. Hammad is offensive because he is not aware of the related rules associated with the development of such an app and it is also violating the basic rights of the targets. Conclusion Life of any individual becomes extremely difficult when his/her basic rights and privileges are violated or ignored. It leads to insecurity and chaos. Right to security and privacy are such rights which are crucial for a happy and peaceful life. The app under scrutiny - stealth genie, violates these fundamental rights of the affected individuals, thus making life difficult for them. The punishment warranted to the developer of this app can be justified in this context. Even though he claims to be ignorant of the legal implications, it was his duty or obligation to know the same. More stringent lawswith a wider ambit should be made in this regard. There are many instances in worldwide where breach of privacy is taken as a serious offence and dealt with strictly (a women deported from UAE for checking husbands phone, Keiser hospital fined $250,000 for privacy breach in Octuplet case, An employee of the Tampa, Florida, health department took a computer disk containing the names of 4,000 people who had tested positive for HIV, the virus that causes AIDS (USA Today, October 10, 1996) so on). Companies and program developers should always remember the legal consequences of their actions and the individuals should be aware of the rights and instances of the violation of the same to ensure a safe and smooth life for all. Awareness campaigns should be conducted for empowering both sections of affected parties. References Himma, K. Tavani, H. (2008).The handbook of information and computer ethics. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. Smith, I., Netchaeva, E., Soderberg, A., Okhuysen, G. (2015). The Behavioral Ethics of Deontology and Utilitarianism: Are They as Separable as They Seem?.Academy Of Management Proceedings,2015(1), 14876-14876. https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.125 Vadastreanu, A., Maier, D., Maier, A. (2015). Is the Success Possible in Compliance with Ethics and Deontology in Business?.Procedia Economics And Finance,26, 1068-1073. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00931-4 Van Staveren, I. (2007). Beyond Utilitarianism and Deontology: Ethics in Economics.Review Of Political Economy,19(1), 21-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538250601080776 Zapotosky, M. (2014).StealthGenie maker fined for 'stalker' app.The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 20 May 2016, from https://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/smartphone-apps/maker-of-smartphone-surveillance-app-fined-avoids-jail-time-20141126-11upqs.html